<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Off The Pond &#124; Oregon Duck Football and Those Other Sports Too &#187; Matt Leinart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.offthepond.net/tag/matt-leinart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.offthepond.net</link>
	<description>Mostly useless but at least a little fun</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 16:15:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rose Bowl Teams Greater Than Individual Parts</title>
		<link>http://www.offthepond.net/2009/12/rose-bowl-teams-greater-than-individual-parts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.offthepond.net/2009/12/rose-bowl-teams-greater-than-individual-parts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick, OTP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chip Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Dickson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Tressel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurt Coleman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Leinart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio State Buckeyes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon Ducks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reggie Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rose Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vince Young]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.offthepond.net/?p=2438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes, a game is greater than the sum of two team&#8217;s parts. Such is the 2010 Rose Bowl. How else do you explain the fact that both participants will be fielding one measly first team all-conference performer as voted on by conference coaches? Big Ten all-Conference Players by Team Iowa 7 Penn State 6 Wisconsin [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes, a game is greater than the sum of two team&#8217;s parts. Such is the 2010 Rose Bowl. How else do you explain the fact that both participants will be fielding one measly first team all-conference performer as voted on by conference coaches?</p>
<div style="float:right; margin:10px 0 10px 10px">
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" frame="box" rules="all">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" bgcolor="#cccccc"><strong>Big Ten all-Conference Players by Team</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Iowa</td>
<td>7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Penn State</td>
<td>6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Wisconsin</td>
<td>3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michigan State</td>
<td>3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michigan</td>
<td>2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Minnesota</td>
<td>1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffff00">Ohio State</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffff00">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Purdue</td>
<td>1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" bgcolor="#cccccc"><strong>Pac-10 all-Conference Players by Team</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oregon State</td>
<td>7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>USC</td>
<td>5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>UCLA</td>
<td>5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>California</td>
<td>5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Stanford</td>
<td>3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Arizona State</td>
<td>1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffff00">Oregon</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffff00">1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>For Oregon, it&#8217;s tight end Ed Dickson. The Buckeyes can boast only of safety Kurt Coleman. That&#8217;s it. Five Big 10 and five Pac-10 teams have more all-conference representatives than these two league champions.</p>
<p>Forget all-Americans, Doak Walkers, Bronco Nagurskis or any other individual honors. These guys are fighting just to get recognition within their own conference.</p>
<p>The Rose Bowl isn&#8217;t a game so often lacking in star power. We&#8217;re talking hallowed grounds where the legends have walked. Vince Young, Reggie Bush and Matt Leinart are just the recent headliners.</p>
<p>Okay, sure, some of this is dramatic effect playing on (flawed?) conference voting that basically ignored the individual accomplishments of two champions. And I&#8217;m sure coaches Chip Kelly and Jim Tressel spent all of one minute caring about such perceived slights.</p>
<p>But it is odd, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Perhaps the matchup we were supposed to get was Oregon State vs. Iowa. After all, both conference runner-ups placed seven players on their respective first teams. That game would have featured 14 first team players. The one we are getting has two.</p>
<p>And with that said, would anyone choose that over Oregon and Ohio State? Okay, perhaps this audience is a highly biased sample, but I&#8217;m guessing there&#8217;s not a lot of clamoring for a Hawkeyes-Beavers matchup beyond these digital walls of Duck fandom.</p>
<p>Whatever slight fans, players and coaches may have at first felt can be safely buried beneath a rug of rose petals. These teams should carry the all-conference voting as a badge of honor where &#8220;team&#8221; matters and &#8220;individual&#8221; is a passing thought.</p>
<p>On January 1, it&#8217;ll be Ducks &#8216;n&#8217; Bucks and that&#8217;s all you need to know. The pieces within those two team names are simply an afterthought.</p>
<p><em><strong>Note:</strong> The Pac-10 includes three more special teams players on its all-conference teams. The Big Ten features both a media and coaches team. The Pac-10 uses only coaches&#8217; selections. For a straight up comparison, the Big Ten&#8217;s media vote was not considered.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.offthepond.net/2009/12/rose-bowl-teams-greater-than-individual-parts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

